Legal Opinion

Javorek v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1976No. S.F. 23324PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SULLIVAN, J.

In this proceeding for a writ of mandate brought under section 418.10, subdivision (c), of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1 we must decide whether quasi in rem jurisdiction over nonresident defendants may be obtained in this state by attaching the obligations of their liability insurer to defend and indemnify them. We are thus called upon to consider the much discussed rule of Seider v. Roth (1966) 17 N.Y.2d 111 [269 N.Y.S.2d 99, 216 N.E.2d 312],

On January 25, 1974, real parties in interest, Jack Bradford Larson, Sr., et al. 2 (hereafter plaintiffs) commenced against…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Watson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Fico, Inc. v. GhingherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Consolidated Construction Services, Inc. v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Arthur Frank Millard v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. Belcher v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API