Pacific Paving Co. v. Vizelich
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in-the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff instituted this action on December 2, 1893, to foreclose the lien of a street assessment upon a lot of land of which defendant Vizelich was alleged to be the owner, and in which defendant Finkbohner was alleged to claim some interest. During the pendency of the action, Finkbohner became the owner of the property by deed from Vizelich. Summons was issued, and was served on Finkbohner on January 13, 1894, but affidavit of such service was not made until December 19, 1899, and the summons was not returned and filed in the office of the clerk of the court until February 19, 1900. On…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- San Francisco Savings Union v. E. B. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- County of San Luis Obispo v. HendricksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Cooper v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Marks v. KeenanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Hayes v. ShattuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Sarracino v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Holden v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Cunha v. Anglo California National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Saddlemire v. Stockton Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Scott v. SciaroniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.