Legal Opinion

Guedalia v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1989No. D009794PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FROEHLICH, J.

In this proceeding in mandate, petitioners Irwin J. Guedalia and James C. Martinez III (Guedalia) request that we order the superior court to vacate its order denying Guedalia’s peremptory challenge to Judge Pate, and that we vacate all orders of the superior court which were entered subsequent to the date on which the peremptory challenge was allegedly wrongfully denied. We conclude that Guedalia’s failure to seek relief by mandamus within 10 days after he was notified of the denial of his peremptory challenge precludes Guedalia from obtaining any relief.

Factual and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Palos Verdes Faculty Ass'n v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. McCorkle v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Tracy v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Curle v. Superior Court of Shasta CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Betz v. PankowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API