Legal Opinion
Kriebel v. City Council
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 26, 1980No. Civ. 22373PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTLER, J. *
Petitioners are owners and residents of property contiguous to the site of a project contemplating the construction of a 46-unit subdivision on undeveloped mesa top and canyon land in La Jolla. The project was proposed by real party in interest-respondent T. H. Nielsen Corporation (Nielsen) and was approved by the respondent City of San Diego City Council (Council).
Petitioners contend the trial court committed two errors which require reversal of the judgment. They claim the court ruled (1) the action was barred for failure to have served summons on the complaint within the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Youngblood v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Davenport v. Superior Court of Imperial CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- General Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Gogerty v. Coachella Valley Junior College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- AILANTO PROPERTIES, INC. v. City of Half Moon BayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- DIAL 800 v. FesbinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Soderling v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- State Farm General Insurance v. JT's Frames, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.