Legal Opinion
People v. Green
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 28, 2004No. E034784PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHLI, J.
Penal Code section 186.11 (section 186.11) is sometimes known as the “Freeze and Seize Law.” (Assem. Com. on Public Safety, Analysis of Assem. Bill No. 2827 (1995-1996 Reg. Sess.) p. 1.) It defines an “aggravated white collar crime enhancement.” When such an enhancement applies, it allows the trial court, before trial, to enjoin the defendant from disposing of assets; it then allows the trial court, after trial, to levy on those assets to pay restitution to victims.
Here, the People seized certain assets of defendant Douglas Green pursuant to a search warrant. Later, however,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. MowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- United States v. Certain Real Property 566 Hendrickson Boulevard, Clawson, Oakland County, Michigan, Leonard Willis, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Walter Camp v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. SemaanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. StarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Integrated Lender Servs., Inc. v. Cnty. of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2016
- Burton v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.