Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. Faus

California Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1957No. L. A. 24444PublishedCited by 215 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in a condemnation proceeding after a trial by jury which fixed the value of their property to be acquired by plaintiff.

Defendants are the owners of certain elongated strips of realty situated in the cities of Alhambra and San Marino. These strips are portions of an abandoned right .of way in the center of Huntington Drive that formerly provided the streetcar route from Los Angeles northeasterly through the Santa Anita area. The vacant right of way is 60 feet wide and divides Huntington Drive. Parcel 20-2, bounded by Stoneman Avenue, Atlantic Avenue and the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. People v. MaughsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Heimann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by215 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981

210 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API