Whittington v. McKinney
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOORE, J.
Defendant Phyllis McKinney appeals a judgment in favor of plaintiff Steve Whittington following a court trial. Whittington alleged McKinney wrongfully caused a notice of default and election to sell under a deed of trust to be recorded against his property. McKinney claimed she was the assigned holder of a note and trust deed against the property which was in default.
Following trial, the court ruled as follows: (1) the note and deed of trust were deemed paid by Whittington and canceled; (2) the assignment of the note and trust deed to McKinney by the Federal Deposit Insurance…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Miramar Hotel Corp. v. Frank B. Hall & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- In Re the Marriage of DittoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- In Re the Marriage of Ananeh-FirempongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Frascona v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Thompson v. AsimosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Molecular Analytical Systems v. Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- J. H. McKnight Ranch, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Kington v. FongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.