Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Ananeh-Firempong

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1990No. B034484PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS (Fred), J.

Husband appeals from a further judgment on reserved issues. He raises several issues regarding the orders and findings of the trial court. The crucial issue that we are called upon to decide is whether a request for a statement of decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 632 can be oral. We conclude that it can and reverse and remand with directions to issue a statement of decision regarding the method of valuation of Husband’s medical practice. Other than the finding regarding the valuation of the Husband’s medical practice, the rest of the judgment is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Homestead Supplies, Inc. v. Executive Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. County of Sacramento v. LacknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. In Re Marriage of BergmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In Re Sade C.California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Ben C.California Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Los Angeles County Department of Children's Services v. Gregory C.California Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Ojavan Investors, Inc. v. California Coastal Com.California Court of Appeal · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API