Legal Opinion
Kington v. Fong
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 3, 2011No. B217038PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Gary Fong appeals an order imposing $200,000 in monetary sanctions against him under Family Code section 2107, subdivision (c)1 for failure to comply with his disclosure obligations and imposing an additional $100,000 in attorney fees and costs under section 271. He contends Marci Kington is not entitled to an award of monetary sanctions under section 2107, subdivision (c) as a matter of law because she failed to comply with her disclosure obligations. He also contends the trial court failed to consider his ability to pay in awarding attorney fees and costs under section…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Hassan v. Mercy American River HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- City of Maywood v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Sorge v. SorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Metis Development LLC v. BohacekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Parker v. HarbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Hoogenberg v. SimmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.