Legal Opinion

Frascona v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 10, 1920No. Civ. No. 3193PublishedCited by 26 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant, a common carrier of passengers, while plaintiff was a passenger on one of its street railway cars. The case was tried by the court without a jury. Judgment passed for plaintiff and defendant appeals. The principal question involves the sufficiency of the finding upon the issue of defendant’s negligence as alleged in the complaint.

The complaint alleges a specific act of negligence on defendant’s part. After alleging that, while she was riding as a passenger on defendant’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Tucker v. United RailroadsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Bard v. KleebWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Dam v. ZinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. In re the Estate of PinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Martin v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. In Re Estate of PendellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Scoville v. KeglorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API