Legal Opinion
In Re the Marriage of Ditto
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 14, 1988No. G005070PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SONENSHINE, J.
Gladys Ditto appeals a judgment on reserved issues, claiming the trial court erred in retroactively applying Civil Code section 4800.2, 2 determining the amount of spousal support, and in denying her attorney fees.
I
Gladys and Joseph Ditto married in 1953 and separated in 1984. The petition for dissolution of marriage was filed on February 4, 1985. The issues presented at trial concerned property division, spousal support, and attorney fees.
The court, in its memorandum of intended decision, indicated it was retroactively applying Civil Code section 4800.2. No request for a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. v. WilkoskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Miramar Hotel Corp. v. Frank B. Hall & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- White v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Jespersen v. Zubiate-BeauchampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Border Business Park, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority v. HenslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- FLIR Systems, Inc. v. ParrishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.