Legal Opinion

J. H. McKnight Ranch, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 2003No. A098729PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEMELLO, J.

In 1995, the Franchise Tax Board (Board) informed the J. H. McKnight Ranch, Inc. (McKnight) that it had underpaid state taxes by approximately $97,000. McKnight protested without success, then paid the disputed tax and filed a refund claim. In discussions with McKnight, the Board reiterated the view that the tax was owed, but offered to deny the refund claim summarily so that McKnight could proceed in court. McKnight accepted the offer and filed suit.

The Board now concedes that under the contested liability doctrine, no tax was ever owed. It nevertheless suggests that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Woosley v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. United States v. Centennial Savings Bank FSBSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Feduniak v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Gilbert Hyatt v. Betty YeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Sahadi v. ScheafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Clews Land & Livestock, LLC v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Lindelli v. Town of San AnselmoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API