Legal Opinion
Cochran v. Kresock
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 5, 1976No. Patent Appeal No. 75-591PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANE, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Interferences1 awarding priority of invention to the junior party Kre-sock after finding that Kresock had attained an actual reduction to practice of his invention on August 23, 1968, and that subsequent to that date he had not abandoned, suppressed, or concealed his invention within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 102(g). This appeal also seeks review of the limitation of the scope of additional discovery granted by the board to the senior party Cochran under 37 CFR 1.287(c). We affirm.
Background
This…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Young v. DworkinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Edwin H. Land and Meroe M. Morse v. Francis A. Regan, Jr., Seamon A. Lincoln and Donald E. HansonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Steinberg v. SeitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Gallagher v. SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- In re DardickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Friction Division Products, Inc. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Kersavage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Randolph v. ShobergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Kahl v. ScovilleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979