Legal Opinion
Schenley Industries, Inc. v. E. Martinoni Company, Joseph S. Finch and Company v. E. Martinoni Company
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 10, 1969No. Patent Appeal 8015, 8024PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
These two appeals from decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, argued before us in the same hearing, are treated together in this opinion since the same issue is involved in both.
In Patent Appeal No. 8015, appellant Schenley Industries, Inc. opposed registration of the trademark “GOLDEN KENTUCKY,” relying on its registration of the trademark “GOLDEN AGE.” Schenley’s Notice of Opposition, though signed by its treasurer, contained no assertion under oath (or equivalent declaration) that the contents of the Notice had been read and were…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Societe Anonyme Marne Et Champagne v. Roger L. MyersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jan Gerritsen and Johannes C.J. Aerts v. Shoji Shirai, Masakzu Fukushima, Satoru Miyamoto and Masahiro MiyazakiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Cook v. DannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Cochran v. KresockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976