Legal Opinion
Preble v. Abrahams
California Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 1891No. 13710PublishedCited by 48 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
The plaintiffs, in their complaint, allege that on the thirteenth day of January, 1888, they and the defendant entered into an agreement, of which the following is a copy:—
“Biggs, January 13, 1888.
“ This agreement made and entered into by C. S. Preble and C. S. Young, of Reno, Nevada, and A. Abrahams, of the same place; said Preble & Young agree to sell to A. Abrahams, of Reno, for $125 per acre, for forty acres of the eighty-acre tract at Biggs, and upon •the payment of the said sum said parties of the first part shall make, execute, and acknowledge, and deliver unto the party of the second…
2Cited by48 opinions
- California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Beverage v. Canton Placer Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Samuels v. OttingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Howard v. AdkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.