Legal Opinion

Beverage v. Canton Placer Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1955No. Sac. 6455PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment on the pleadings in an action to enforce specifically defendant mining company’s contract to convey certain real property and to quiet the adverse claim of defendant Heney. Defendants’ objections to the introduction of evidence and their motion for judgment on the pleadings were based on the following grounds: (1) the complaint failed to state a cause of action because of insufficiency of the property description in the alleged contract to satisfy the statute of frauds (Civ. Code, § 1624; Code Civ. Proc., § 1973); (2) the complaint failed to allege a tender…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Gill v. Curtis Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Rannard v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Craig v. ZelianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. McKevitt v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Loral Corp. v. MoyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Maxon v. Security Insurance of New Haven ConnecticutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API