Legal Opinion

Kinsey v. Pacific Employers Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 7, 2006No. SC 17182PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PALMER, J.

The defendant, Pacific Employers Insurance Company, appeals from the judgment of the trial court confirming an arbitration decision in favor of the plaintiff, Jerome Kinsey. This case arises out of an automobile accident in which the plaintiff, who was operating a vehicle owned by his employer and insured under a commercial fleet automobile insurance policy issued by the defendant, sustained injuries that were caused by an underinsured motorist. The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly concluded that a written request by the plaintiffs employer for a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. Hansen v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Ceci v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Teresa T. v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Considine v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Hummel v. Marten Transports, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Lone Star Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. Windels v. Environmental Protection CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Stone-Krete Construction, Inc. v. EderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API