Legal Opinion
Teresa T. v. Ragaglia
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 8, 2005No. SC 17033PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The dispositive issue in this case, which comes to us on certification from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit pursuant to General Statutes § 51-199b (d) and Practice Book § 82-l,1 is whether the commissioner of children and families (commissioner) is required to remove a child from his or her surroundings pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-lOlg (c)2 if the commissioner has probable cause to *737believe that the child is in imminent risk of physical harm and that immediate removal is necessary to ensure the child’s safety. We conclude that § 17a-101g (c)…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Tenenbaum v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Sealed v. SealedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Sabia v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Harris v. Bradley Memorial Hospital & Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- In Re Leah S.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Kinsey v. Pacific Employers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Weems v. Citigroup, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.