Legal Opinion

Hummel v. Marten Transports, Ltd.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 22, 2007No. 17494, 17496PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PALMER, J.

This certified appeal raises two principal issues: (1) whether, under the plain meaning rule of recently enacted General Statutes § 1-2z,2 we are obliged to overrule our precedent importing a final judgment requirement into General Statutes § 31-30 lb,3 which governs appeals from the compensation review board (board) to the Appellate Court, because § 31-301b does not refer to such a requirement; and (2) if not, whether we nevertheless should reconsider and abandon our long-standing interpretation of § 31-30 lb as containing a final judgment requirement. The plaintiff, Debra…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. Hall v. Gilbert & Bennett Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Marone v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Batte-Holmgren v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. State v. LockhartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Rivers v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. Lopa v. Brinker International, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API