Hummel v. Marten Transports, Ltd.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
This certified appeal raises two principal issues: (1) whether, under the plain meaning rule of recently enacted General Statutes § 1-2z,2 we are obliged to overrule our precedent importing a final judgment requirement into General Statutes § 31-30 lb,3 which governs appeals from the compensation review board (board) to the Appellate Court, because § 31-301b does not refer to such a requirement; and (2) if not, whether we nevertheless should reconsider and abandon our long-standing interpretation of § 31-30 lb as containing a final judgment requirement. The plaintiff, Debra…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Hall v. Gilbert & Bennett Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Marone v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Batte-Holmgren v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. LockhartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Rivers v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Lopa v. Brinker International, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.