Legal Opinion
Stone-Krete Construction, Inc. v. Eder
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 19, 2006No. SC 17686PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The defendant, Jill P. Eder, appeals from the decision of the trial court denying her motion to discharge a mechanic’s lien filed by the plaintiff, Stone-Krete Construction, Inc., in this action for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. The defendant contends that the trial court improperly concluded that the mechanic’s lien complied with the “subscribed and sworn to” requirements of General Statutes § 49-34 (1) (C)1 because the hen did not contain a written recital of an oath swearing to the truth of the facts contained in the lien and because the jurat2 executed by a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Community Action for Greater Middlesex County, Inc. v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Red Rooster Construction Co. v. River Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Fedus v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Kinsey v. Pacific Employers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Kellner v. ChristianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Hummel v. Marten Transports, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Saunders v. FirtelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Weber v. U.S. Sterling Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Ravetto v. Triton Thalassic Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Kaczynski v. KaczynskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.