Legal Opinion
Ceci v. National Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 23, 1993No. 14524PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether, under the facts of this case, the plaintiff is entitled to underinsured motorist benefits, as a “family member” of the insured, pursuant to the business automobile insurance policy issued by the defendant to the plaintiffs corporate employer.1 The plaintiff, Michael Ceci, having sustained injuries as a pedestrian when he was struck by an underinsured motorist, sought to recover underinsured motorist benefits under a business automobile insurance policy issued by the defendant, National Indemnity Company, to Victor Ceci Refuse, Inc., a corporation…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Beach v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Bodner v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Streitweiser v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance v. McKeeTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Community Action for Greater Middlesex County, Inc. v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Progressive Casualty Insurance v. Robert Mathew Hurley & Devil Eleven, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Bushey v. Northern Assurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- American Economy Insurance Co. v. BogdahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.