Legal Opinion
Considine v. City of Waterbury
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 12, 2006No. SC 17551PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The defendant, the city of Waterbury, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Edward Considine. The defendant contends that the trial court improperly determined that governmental immunity as set forth in General Statutes § 52-557n1 did not shield it from liability and that the plaintiff had proffered sufficient evidence to establish that the defendant was negligent in maintaining its property. We disagree, and, accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*833The trial court found the following pertinent facts. For many…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Carrol v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Hyde v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Grady v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- People v. CasiasColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Antilles School, Inc. v. LembachSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
- Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Testa v. GeressySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.