Worth v. Worth
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial, in an action brought by plaintiff to foreclose the lien of a mortgage-given by defendant to plaintiff, to secure the payment of a promissory note dated February 15, 1899, for twenty-five hundred dollars, bearing interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum and payable March 1, 1902.
1. It appears from the amended complaint that this action was not commenced until shortly after the expiration of four years from the maturity of the note. A demurrer was interposed to the amended complaint based on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Foster v. BowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Klokke v. EscaillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Peachy v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Weinberger v. WeidmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- County Bank v. GoldtreeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by11 opinions
- Merrimon v. ParkeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
- University of Richmond v. StoneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
- Jensen v. LichtensteinUtah Supreme Court · 1915
- Galvin v. O'GormanMontana Supreme Court · 1910
- Fielding v. IlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.