Legal Opinion

County Bank v. Goldtree

California Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1900No. L.A. No. 615PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

This is an action on a note and to foreclose certain grant deeds of land given by way of mortgage to secure the payment of said note. Defendants appeal from the judgment.

The complaint shows that defendants jointly executed to plaintiff a note for thirty-three thousand one hundred and nineteen dollars and fifty-eight cents, and thereafter, as security for the payment of the same, defendants conveyed to plaintiff by deeds of grant certain described real estate. “That said conveyance of said real estate by defendants to plaintiff is and was intended by both plaintiff and defendants, as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clemens v. LuceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Irvine v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Boob v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Russell v. FindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Merrimon v. ParkeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Commercial Savings Bank v. HornbergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. University of Richmond v. StoneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  4. Jensen v. LichtensteinUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Peachy v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API