Legal Opinion
Peachy v. Witter
California Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 1901No. L.A. No. 782PublishedCited by 18 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
The defendants appeal from a judgment against them and from an order denying their motion for a new trial in a suit brought by plaintiff on a promissory note for four hundred dollars, besides interest, and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure said note. There is also an appeal from an order denying one Charles Orendorff the right to intervene.
1. Appellants contend that the description of the premises alleged to be mortgaged, as it appears in the complaint, is uncertain, and for that reason the demurrer to the complaint for uncertainty should have been sustained. A part of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hughes v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Williams v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Murray v. EtchepareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- County Bank v. GoldtreeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Kern Valley Bank v. ChesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by18 opinions
- Shortell v. Evans-Ferguson Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- University of Richmond v. StoneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
- Jensen v. LichtensteinUtah Supreme Court · 1915
- Flynn v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Ritter v. RitterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.