Legal Opinion
Jensen v. Lichtenstein
Utah Supreme Court
Decided January 9, 1915No. 2690PublishedCited by 21 opinions
Appeal from District Court, Third District, Hon. George G. Armstrong, Judge. Action by F. C. Jensen against M. B. Lichtenstein and another. From the judgment defendants appeal and plaintiff cross-appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants in the district court of Salt Lake County to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the payment of the following note:
*322“Salt Labe City, Utah, June 25, 1909. $10,000. Two (2) years after date, for value received, we jointly and severally promise to' pay to Utah Savings & Trust Company, or order, ten thousand dollars, with interest thereon at the rate of seven per cent per annum from date until paid, both before and after judgment. Interest payable quarter-yearly to the Utah Savings & Trust Co., whose receipt for same shall be accepted…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Boucofski v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1909
- Clemens v. LuceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Utah National Bank of Salt Lake City v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1910
- Klokke v. EscaillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Armijo v. HenryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1907
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Mountain States Broadcasting Co. v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Cody v. CodyUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- Watkins & Faber v. WhiteleyUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Christensen v. MunnsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- Mason v. MasonUtah Supreme Court · 1945
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.