Legal Opinion

Foster v. Bowles

California Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1903No. S.F. No. 2323PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

Action on a note for $15,000 and interest, and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure said note upon 242.59 acres of land situated in Livermore Valley, in Alameda County. The plaintiff had judgment against most of the defendants by default. Certain parties defendant, known as the “Bohrer Trustees,” answered, and judgment went in their favor to the extent of the interest claimed by them. From this latter judgment the plaintiff appeals.

On December 2, 1887, the defendant Bowles executed the note and mortgage in suit to Alexander Montgomery. The note became due and payable three years…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Concannon v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. State Loan & Trust Co. v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Kelly v. LeachmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Western Coal & Mining Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Searles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Fitzgerald v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Pacific Trust Co. TTEE v. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API