Fielding v. Iler
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHaven, J.
Action for foreclosure of a mortgage given as security for the payment of a promissory note dated Decern ber 21, 1908, and payable three years after date. In July, 1909, the defendant Iler, maker of the note and mortgage, conveyed the mortgaged premises to the defendants Anderson, who are husband and wife. This conveyance contained the stipulation “that the same ivas made subject to said mortgage which the parties of the second part therein assumed and agreed to pay.” Thereupon the defendants Anderson entered into possession of the mortgaged premises, and paid interest upon the mortgage debt…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Concannon v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Rodgers v. ByersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Williams v. NaftzgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Watt v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Dew v. AppleberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Tompkins v. PowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Chaplin v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- McCarthy v. KurkjianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.