Legal Opinion

Merrimon v. Parkey

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1916PublishedCited by 30 opinions

FROM BLOUNT. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Blount County. —Hal H. Haynes, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

On February 13, 1906, W. C. Parkey and Jesse L. Rogers, being the owners of a tract of land of four thousand five hundred sixty-four and one-half acres, conveyed a three-fourths undivided interest therein to H. E. Fugate, A. J. Moles, and W. S. Moles for a consideration of $42,792.19, a part of which was paid in cash. In order that each of the vendors might receive and handle his own portion of the purchase-money notes, these were executed in two series, of three notes of $6,132.03 each, maturing in one, two, and three years, respectively, from date.

Each note contained a recital that interest…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fanning v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Daly v. Sumpter Drug Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Johnson v. Harder & AverySupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  4. Sully v. ChildressTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Ricketson v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. University of Richmond v. StoneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  2. Nickey Bros. v. Lonsdale Mfg. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Roe v. SmythNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Villines v. Parham-Lindsey Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927
  5. Doty v. Federal Land Bank of LouisvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1936

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API