Legal Opinion

Doolittle v. McConnell

California Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1918No. Sac. No. 2605. Department TwoPublishedCited by 50 opinions

■The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. C. E. McLaughlin, and White, Miller, Needham & Harber, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Defendant, as executor of the estate of Ellen M. Wilson, deceased, appeals from a judgment based upon a suit upon a creditor’s claim. The amount of the judgment was fifteen thousand dollars.

Mrs. Wilson died in 1907. By her will all of her property Was disposed of in a manner ignoring her niece, the plaintiff herein, her son, defendant herein, being the principal beneficiary under the testament.

The will was admitted to probate in May, 1907, and within the statutory time plaintiff presented a creditor’s claim for twenty-five thousand dollars for personal services rendered her aunt, Mrs. Ellen…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Philbrook v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Sonnicksen v. SonnicksenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Nathanson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Rosemead Co. v. Shipley Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Leoni v. DelanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API