Legal Opinion

Sonnicksen v. Sonnicksen

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1941No. Civ. 11679PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Two appeals are involved in the instant case, one being an appeal by the defendant from a decree quieting title in the plaintiffs to certain described property, the other being an appeal by the plaintiffs from a portion of the decree which excepted from its operation property which had been set aside to the defendant as a homestead in a probate proceeding. The complaint is framed as one to quiet title but in addition to the usual prayer in that respect it prays for a decree that the defendant holds all the described property in trust for plaintiffs; that she be required to convey the same to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Owens v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Estate of RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. McCabe v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Ludwicki v. GuerinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Adams v. WolffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Goldstein v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API