Frost v. Witter
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County and from an order denying a new trial. E. P. Unangst, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH,C.
—Appeal from a judgment for foreclosure of mortgaged premises and from an order denying defendant’s motion for new trial.
The original complaint counted on a promissory note made by the defendant to one Speyer, March 14, 1894, payable six months after date, and assigned to plaintiff. It was filed September 12, 1898, two days before the lapse of four years from the maturity of the note. An amended complaint was filed September 16,1898, which, in addition to the matter alleged in the original complaint, counted also on a mortgage of even date, executed by the defendant to secure the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Castagnino v. BallettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Walsh v. MckeenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Burns v. ScooffyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.