Legal Opinion

Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1896No. L. A. No. 48PublishedCited by 126 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County and from an order refusing a new trial. J. S. Noyes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The plaintiff, Annie L. Sloane, purchased a ticket April 8, 1894, from the agent of the defendant, at North Pomona, for passage from that place to San Diego, and on the same day took passage upon the regular passenger train of the defendant. Before reaching San Bernardino the conductor of the train took up her ticket, without giving her any check or other *676evidence of her right to be carried to San Diego, and on arriving at San Bernardino she was required to change cars, and enter another train of cars of the defendant. After entering this train, the conductor in charge thereof demanded of her…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Purcell v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Head v. Georgia Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  3. Baltimore City Passenger Railway Co. v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  4. Warren v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  5. Georgia Railroad v. HomerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Faya v. AlmarazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API