Legal Opinion

Steinberger v. Young

California Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1917No. L. A. No. 3852PublishedCited by 59 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. H. M. Barstow, Milton K. Young, Davis, Kemp & Post, Joseph Scott, A. G. Ritter, and Taylor & Forgy, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

Elizabeth B. Ross died intestate on January 5, 1910, leaving an estate of considerable value.

This action was brought against her heirs and the administrator of her estate to obtain specific performance of an agreement alleged to have been made in September, 1865, between one Halbert, plaintiff’s stepfather, and plaintiff herself, on the one hand, and Elizabeth Ross, on the other, whereby Elizabeth Ross agreed that she would adopt the plaintiff, take her into her home and treat her as her own daughter, and that said plaintiff should be the heir of said Elizabeth, and on her death should be…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PepperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Couts v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Love v. WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Monsen v. MonsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Austin v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Stromerson v. AverillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Crail v. BlakelyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Estate of RollsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API