Legal Opinion

Rosemead Co. v. Shipley Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 9961PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

The decree is affirmed. By it the plaintiff, Rosemead Company, a common law trust", is declared the owner of the property in suit. As incidental to this relief, the defendant Shipley Company, a corporation, is found to be the alter ego of its grantor, the defendant Don P. Jones, and is declared to hold the conveyance of said property as security only. The decree also declares the. transaction resulting in the conveyance of said property as security to be usurious and the right to interest is thereby denied. An accounting is had between the parties and a reconveyance is directed upon payment…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Lavely v. NonemakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. GreenbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API