Legal Opinion

Shapiro v. Shapiro

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1932No. Docket No. 8588PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODWARD, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff instituted an action for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty, setting forth eleven specific acts of marital misconduct on the part of the defendant. The trial court found in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant’s cross-complaint and plea of recrimination.

Appellant states in his opening brief that as to several of the accusations pleaded by plaintiff and found to be true by the court, the evidence is in “substantial conflict”, but urges nevertheless that the judgment should be reversed for the reason that his own recriminatory plea was fully…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Avery v. AveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Quagelli v. QuagelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Rose v. RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Hawkins v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Arnold v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. McClenny v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Tompkins v. TompkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API