Rose v. Rose
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order denying a new trial. W. E. Greene, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
Action for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty and habitual intemperance.
The decree was in favor of plaintiff, granting her a divorce on both grounds, and awarding her the larger share of the community property. Defendant appeals from the judgment and an order denying him a new trial.
A careful review of the record discloses no substantial merit in the points urged in behalf of appellant.
The objection that the complaint is insufficient in its statement of the cause of action for intemperance is untenable. Assuming that it would be obnoxious to a special demurrer on the ground of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Reading v. ReadingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by16 opinions
- Burke v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- City of La Mesa v. Tweed & Gambrell Planing MillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Glen Arms Estate, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. ForsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Eckhart v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.