Legal Opinion

Tompkins v. Tompkins

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1947No. Civ. 13441PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINLEY, J. pro tem.

This is an action for divorce wherein plaintiff, the wife, complains in two counts. In the first cause of action she alleges extreme cruelty; in the second, desertion. In awarding her judgment from the bench the trial court specified that it was on the ground of defendant’s desertion. In its written findings the court found that defendant had been guilty of extreme cruelty toward plaintiff and also that he had deserted and abandoned plaintiff, which desertion had continued for more than one year. In the conclusions of law and interlocutory judgment neither ground is…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Barnes v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Mears v. MearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Philbin v. PhilbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Pencovic v. PencovicCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Jones v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API