Legal Opinion
De Burgh v. De Burgh
California Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 1952No. L. A. 21986PublishedCited by 148 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
Plaintiff Daisy M. De Burgh and defendant Albert Raymond De Burgh were married in California in October, 1946. They separated in February, 1949, and in the same year plaintiff brought this action for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. Defendant filed a cross-complaint for divorce, also on the ground of extreme cruelty. The allegations of cruelty were denied in the answers filed by each party. The trial court found “that each of the parties to this action has been guilty of acts of cruelty towards the other, and that such acts of cruelty by each toward the other, were provoked by the…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Loughran v. LoughranSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by148 opinions
- In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.