King v. Samuel
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Action to quiet title. • The controversy concerns the title to certain swamp and overflowed land in sections 27 and 28, township 15 south, range 23 east, Mount Diablo base and meridian, situated in Fresno county. The land in question is that portion of said sections, embraced in survey number 593, lying on the east side of Kings river. The survey is particularly described in the complaint by metes and bounds, “as described in patent of the State of California to W. T. Cole, recorded May 1, 1888, in Book of Patents, at page 41, Records of Fresno County.” Plaintiff alleged ownership in fee on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barnett v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Johnson v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Teralta Land & Water Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Martin v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Williams v. HarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Mercury Herald Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Wolf v. DonahueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Mercury Herald Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Mercury Herald Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.