Legal Opinion

Wolf v. Donahue

California Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 9199PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSea Well, J.

This appeal was taken from a judgment decreeing that by a contract and agreement entered into by and between Daniel Donahue and respondent, Jennie Wolf, in 1911, she was entitled to all of the real and personal property standing in the name of Daniel Donahue at the time of his decease and claimed by the administrator of his estate as property belonging to his estate and directing that conveyances of the real property be executed and delivery of the personal property be made to respondent by said administrator after the payment of all lawful subsisting claims and demands against said estate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Owens v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. McCabe v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Kenniff v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Rogers v. SchlotterbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Sonnicksen v. SonnicksenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Ludwicki v. GuerinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Goldstein v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API