Williams v. Harter
California Supreme Court
APPJBAL from a judgment .of the.Superior. .Court of Modoe County. G. G. Clough, Judge. Also, from an order denying a. new trial. C.. L. Claflin, Judge. The facts are stated in the' opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
BELCHER, C.
George E. Williams died testate in the county of Modoc in 1891, owning a large tract of land in that county. His will was duly admitted to probate, and Mary E. Williams, his surviving wife, was appointed executrix thereof. As such executrix she brought this action to obtain an injunction restraining the defendants from diverting water from the said lands,, and also to recover damages for past diversions.
It is alleged in.the complaint that the estate .of said decedent now owns and occupies, and it and its grantors and predecessor® have owned and occupied for more than twenty years…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stanley v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- De Necochea v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Harris v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Bollo v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Ely v. FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Tulare County Power Co. v. Pacific Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- American Type Founders' Co. v. NicholsTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- Toyaho Creek Irrigation Co. v. HutchinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Commercial Credit Co. v. BrownTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.