Johnson v. Taylor
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to certain land in Mendocino County. The defendants answered, denying the plaintiff’s title, and filed cross-complaints setting up title in themselves and praying that their title be quieted against the plaintiff. Judgment went for the defendants, granting them the affirmative relief sought by them. The plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was denied, and he now appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
Defendants are the heirs and successors in interest of W. H. Johnson, and it is admitted that they are the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Curtis v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Miller v. LucoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Smith v. ClevelandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
- Merrill v. DearingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- White Lighting Co. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Clark v. DuncansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Buck v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.