Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Mercury Herald Co. v. Moore

California Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1943No. S. F. 16809Published

1Opinion of the Court

22 Cal.2d 269 (1943)

MERCURY HERALD COMPANY (a Corporation), Petitioner,

v.

MAURICE MOORE, as County Auditor, etc., Respondent.

S. F. No. 16809.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

June 1, 1943.

Francis A. Zingheim and Chesley M. Douglas for Petitioners.

Robert W. Kenny, Attorney General, H. H. Linney, Assistant Attorney General, Adrian A. Kragen, Deputy Attorney General, J. H. O'Connor, County Counsel (Los Angeles), A. Curtis Smith, Deputy County Counsel, Paul A. McCarthy,

John P. Fitzgerald, District Attorney (Santa Clara), and Leonard R. Avilla, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent. City…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Edmonds; Concurrence · Carter.

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Louisiana Ex Rel. Folsom v. Mayor and Administrators of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Crane v. HahloSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API