Legal Opinion

Detray v. Chambers

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1931No. Docket No. 352PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an action in equity, brought for the purpose of setting aside a judgment obtained by the defendant herein against these plaintiffs in another action now pending in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. In that other action, Frank T. DeTray and Ethel B. DeTray were suing R. C. Chambers and his wife for damages growing out of an automobile accident. Chambers and his wife answered, and at the same time R. C. Chambers filed a cross-complaint naming Frank R. DeTray and Ethel B. DeTray as cross-defendants. A general demurrer to this cross-complaint was sustained as to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Douglass v. ToddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Brum v. IvinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Frost v. HanscomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Amestoy Estate Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. McPhee v. Reclamation Dist. No. 765California Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Metzger v. VestalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Lennefelt v. CranstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API