Amestoy Estate Co. v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, .P. J.
Action to vacate a judgment of the superior court, and to enjoin defendant from asserting rights thereunder.
The complaint alleges ownership by plaintiff of a large ranch in Los Angeles county, traversed by the Los Angeles river, a non-navigable stream. That said lands are riparian to said stream and the waters thereof are necessary for the irrigation of said lands, and have been so used for more than fifty years. That heretofore, in April, 1903, while plaintiff was so seised, the defendant commenced an action against plaintiff in the superior court of Los Angeles county to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Parsons v. WeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Douglass v. ToddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Kahn v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Wattson v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Federal Land Bk. of Spokane v. Gallatin Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
- Westinghouse Credit Corp. v. WolferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.