Douglass v. Todd
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco vacating a default judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.—
Appeal from an order vacating a judgment entered against defendant upon default.
The affidavit of defendant stated facts showing a sufficient defense to plaintiff’s action, at least as to the first cause of action.
Plaintiff filed a counter-affidavit, which it is contended rebuts the facts stated in defendant’s affidavit.
It is well settled that a default will not be set aside unless a sufficient affidavit of merits is filed; but proper practice does not permit the facts stated in defendant’s affidavit, which constitute his defense to the action, to be rebutted by counter-affidavits.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whereatt v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Baxter v. ChuteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Francis v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Hanson v. MichelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
- Smith v. TunsteadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Waite v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Security Truck Line v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Eureka County Bank Habeas Corpus CasesNevada Supreme Court · 1912
- Cragin v. Henderson County Oil Development Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Mitchell v. Cal. & Or. Coast S.S. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.