Legal Opinion

Douglass v. Todd

California Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1892No. 14789PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco vacating a default judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Haynes, C.—

Appeal from an order vacating a judgment entered against defendant upon default.

The affidavit of defendant stated facts showing a sufficient defense to plaintiff’s action, at least as to the first cause of action.

Plaintiff filed a counter-affidavit, which it is contended rebuts the facts stated in defendant’s affidavit.

It is well settled that a default will not be set aside unless a sufficient affidavit of merits is filed; but proper practice does not permit the facts stated in defendant’s affidavit, which constitute his defense to the action, to be rebutted by counter-affidavits.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whereatt v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Baxter v. ChuteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Francis v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Hanson v. MichelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Smith v. TunsteadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Waite v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Security Truck Line v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Eureka County Bank Habeas Corpus CasesNevada Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Cragin v. Henderson County Oil Development Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Mitchell v. Cal. & Or. Coast S.S. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API