Brum v. Ivins
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. E. P. Unangst, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This action was brought in the superior court of San Luis Obispo County to restrain the sheriff of said county and his deputies from levying a certain execution upon plaintiff’s real estate.
On October 10, 1904, one Blumenthal commenced an action in the justice’s court of the city and county of San Francisco against Manuel S. de Brum to recover sixty dollars with interest, alleged to be due on a promissory note made and delivered by Manuel S. de Brum to Dr. Meyers & Co., or order, and assigned to Blumenthal. The note, as set forth in the complaint, was by its terms, payable at San Francisco.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Agard v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Z. Russ & Sons Co. v. CrichtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Ede v. HazenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Bloomfield Railroad v. BurressIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Roman Catholic Archbishop v. ShipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hammell v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Thomson v. L. C. Roney & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Dieckmann v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Wattson v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Sakaguchi v. SakaguchiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.