Lennefelt v. Cranston
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.
In this action in equity to set aside an order fixing inheritance tax upon the ground of extrinsic mistake the trial court found that the mistake was intrinsic rather than extrinsic and denied relief. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.
The broad statutory provisions for relief from mistake (Code Civ. Proe., § 473) are not available to plaintiffs in this case because application for such relief was not made within six months after the making of the order. Plaintiffs do not contend otherwise and they also acknowledge that “equitable relief from a judgment [or order] taken by mistake will be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hallett v. SlaughterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Turner v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Preston v. Wyoming Pacific Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Marriage of GuardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- In Re Marriage of WipsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Westinghouse Credit Corp. v. WolferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Allen v. FlournoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Estate of TalbotCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.