Legal Opinion

Frost v. Hanscome

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1926No. Docket No. S.F. 10934PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to annul two judgments obtained against him by the defendants Wood and Turner, respectively; also to compel the surrender of certain securities pledged by him to the said defendants; also for $30,000 actual damages and additional damages in the sum of $20,000 by way of punishment.

The complaint charges the defendants with fraud in obtaining said judgments and with a conspiracy to abstract from him his money and property by fraud and deceit. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case defendants moved the court for a nonsuit on the ground that there was no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. J. F. Parkinson Co. v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Parsons v. WeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Sohler v. SohlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Janin v. London & San Francisco BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Niosi v. AielloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Masters v. DunstanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Adams v. AlbanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
  5. McGregor v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API